W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

RE: #issue-whichlangs editorial tweak

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:05:16 -0600
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1164845116.3997.1373.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:44 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
> 2. Where do we stand on multiple transform languages?

In the phone call today, I went over the relevant text with
Brian and noticed that it said "transformations should
be available..." which suggests that transformations
have some choice in the matter.

I made this change...

Revision 1.166  2006/11/29 23:41:05  connolly
in discussion of transformation formats, make
it clear who the "should" applies to, and
use "GRDDL processor" from the glossary
rather than "consumer".

resulting in...

Developers of transformations should make available representations in
widely-supported formats. XSLT version 1[XSLT1] is the format most
widely supported by GRDDL processors as of this writing, though though
XSLT2[XSLT2] deployment is increasing.

Normally I'd just make a change like this without any special
notice, but our 30 Aug #issue-whichlangs decision referred to
the specific text in the spec...

RESOLUTION: to address [#issue-whichlangs] as per the current draft
(1.83 2006/08/25 20:23:09). SHOULD support XSLT 1; MAY support others.

so in some sense, I'm re-opening that decision.

The chair might choose to have the WG explicitly confirm that
this change is editorial and doesn't impact the decision we made,
though I suggest it's not necessary; this notice is probably
sufficient. I'm inclined to take silence as agreement.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:05:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC