W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: fixed GRDDL formal rules... Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:36:46 -0600
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1162784207.8279.176.camel@dirk>

On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 11:13 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote:
> At 03:09 AM 11/5/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> >I achieved fugue state again tonight and changed it.
> 
> I hope you are feeling better soon.

Hmm... am I misusing the word? I thought it was a good thing...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugue_state suggests it means
amnesia... maybe I meant flow as in 
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MentalStateCalledFlow

> 
> >[[
> >If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root
> >element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified
> >by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC
> ><http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with
> >any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR
> >]]
> >  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind
> >  1.150  2006/11/05 08:56:53
> >
> >The rules feel much sturdier now. I think this eliminates
> >the need for separate slides...
> 
> Maybe it's the time of day, but that doesn't help me at all.
> I think that I might need several slides just to understand
> what is being said above.

OK, maybe slides are worthwhile after all. Hmm..

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 03:36:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT