Re: fixed GRDDL formal rules... Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

At 03:09 AM 11/5/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

>I achieved fugue state again tonight and changed it.

I hope you are feeling better soon.


>[[
>If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root
>element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified
>by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC
><http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with
>any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR
>]]
>  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind
>  1.150  2006/11/05 08:56:53
>
>The rules feel much sturdier now. I think this eliminates
>the need for separate slides...

Maybe it's the time of day, but that doesn't help me at all.
I think that I might need several slides just to understand
what is being said above.

Sorry.

Murray

Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 16:39:31 UTC