W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: fixed GRDDL formal rules... Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:13:51 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

At 03:09 AM 11/5/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

>I achieved fugue state again tonight and changed it.

I hope you are feeling better soon.

>If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root
>element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified
>by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC
><http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with
>any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR
>  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind
>  1.150  2006/11/05 08:56:53
>The rules feel much sturdier now. I think this eliminates
>the need for separate slides...

Maybe it's the time of day, but that doesn't help me at all.
I think that I might need several slides just to understand
what is being said above.


Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 16:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC