W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: toward tests for spec#issue-mt-ns

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:27:08 -0600
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1162366028.8627.186.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:13 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> Brian sketched some tests a while ago...
> 
> Grddl Squirrel 6 test cases
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Mar/0011.html

> I didn't really finish making the test case.

I think I got it working now.

The question is: if a document looks like RDF
(with a namespaceTransformation property) but is labelled
with content-type application/xml, does it have any (non-trivial)
GRDDL results?

My glean.py implementation currently says: no.
So that's what I put in the test suite, for now.
sq1-output.rdf is an empty graph.



    <#sq1>     a :Test;
         dc:title "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media
types";
         :description "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media
types";
         :inputDocument <sq1.xml>;
         :outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>;
	 .
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.n3
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1.xml
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1-output.rdf

I added another test to sorta show why sq1 has
an empty result:

    <#sq1a>     a :Test;
         dc:title "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has
no/empty GRDDL result";
         :description "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has
no/empty GRDDL result";
         :inputDocument <sq1ns.xml>;
         :outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>;
	 .

And another to show the non-squirrely case...

   <#grddl_rdf>     a :Test;
         dc:title "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML
reading is a grddl result";
         :description "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML
reading is a grddl result";
         :inputDocument <projects.rdf>;
         :outputDocument <projects.rdf>;
	 .

I think the spec doesn't actually say that yet.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 07:27:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT