W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

RE: XPROC and the XINCLUDE issue

From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:27:27 -0000
Message-ID: <86FE9B2B91ADD04095335314BE6906E8AC88D5@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

> This looks like a reasonable test (please do check it in)

I'm not familiar with how yet.  Do I have CVS or other access.  Is there
a test manifest somewhere.

> but 
> I don't see any mention of XInclude nor XProc in it. Is that 
> by design?

Yes.  This first test case was just to establish that there is a 'lower
bound' to the GRDDL results of a transform and that is the GRDDL result
applied to the infoset that is the result of simple parsing of the input
XML document.

I think this test case does this.  

BTW, I'm on leave till 8th Jan 2007.


> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 07:27:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC