W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: XPROC and the XINCLUDE issue

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:04:21 -0600
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1166627061.9088.323.camel@dirk>

On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 03:17 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
> We had a useful discussion at last Wednesday's call.  Since then I've
> had a look at the XPROC spec and I think I may now agree with Murray.
> 
> I expect we will have several test cases.  Here is one.  It is a
> negative test case.  The result document is not a GRDDL result of the
> input document.

This looks like a reasonable test (please do check it in) but
I don't see any mention of XInclude nor XProc in it. Is
that by design?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 15:04:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT