W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: GRDDL and HTML5

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:13:43 +0200
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0808260113n20f19165pec4246530af15555@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>

2008/8/26 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>:
> On Aug 26, 2008, at 5:02 AM, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
>
>>> From: Bijan Parsia
>>> [ . . . ]
>>> Encouraging people to dereference (or to
>>> write software that dereferences) things like namespaces has turned
>>> out not to be such a great idea and, arguably, isn't necessary or
>>> helpful.
>>
>> I completely disagree.
>
> Oi! Are you and Danny completely not paying attention? I didn't reply to set
> up a debate but to correct a misimpression, to wit, that the "RDF community"
> has consensus on the GRDDL design. So, all this other stuff is just
> *irrelevant*.

Er, scrollback.

>>  Dereferencing things like namespaces may not be useful or helpful to
>> *you*, but that does not mean it is not useful or helpful to others.
>
> Esp. when it is of this low quality. I didn't say it was not useful or
> helpful to *ME*, I said it was not, on balance, useful and helpful to
> encourage people to do this, esp. systematically. Lack of utility to me, or
> utility to *SOMEONE*, doesn't even start to refute this point of view.
>
> I suspect we should stop CCing Ian (or just stop).

As long as Ian is the benevolent dictator of HTML, he should know a
decent sample of opinion.


Cheers,
Danny.



-- 
http://dannyayers.com
~
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 08:14:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:03 UTC