W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: What about XQuery? (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels, #issue-output-formats) [closed]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:08:05 -0500
To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>, Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, w3c-xsl-query@w3.org
Message-Id: <1184962085.4187.796.camel@pav>

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 15:27 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
[...]
> Yes, this is satisfactory.

OK, great.

>  (I might prefer to move the statement that 
> other languages are not specified to the paragraph I quoted, but that's 
> editorial and a matter of taste.)

We're in the end-game, where stability is valuable...
but I can see your point, and I'll keep it in mind in
case it's easy to work in at some point.

> Thanks!

Welcome. Likewise, thanks for the suggestion.

> Jonathan
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 20:08:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT