- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:47:35 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>, Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, w3c-xsl-query@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:07 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: [...] > > The string XQuery does not occur at all in this document, which seems > > odd considering the several discussions of what language choice is > > best for processing XML. > XQuery is a wonderful language that has my full support, as I have > mentioned to you before. However, current GRDDL implementations all > currently support only XSLT 1 [1], and so we do not mention XQuery per > se in the specification. I don't feel too strongly about it one way or the other. If I saw an actual GRDDL implementation that supported XQuery, yes, I'd feel more obliged to mentioned it in the spec. Meanwhile, if you want to make a concrete suggestion about text to add, I'm happy to look it over. > [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results > [2]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-whichlangs -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 18:47:47 UTC