On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:07 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: [...] > > The string XQuery does not occur at all in this document, which seems > > odd considering the several discussions of what language choice is > > best for processing XML. > XQuery is a wonderful language that has my full support, as I have > mentioned to you before. However, current GRDDL implementations all > currently support only XSLT 1 [1], and so we do not mention XQuery per > se in the specification. I don't feel too strongly about it one way or the other. If I saw an actual GRDDL implementation that supported XQuery, yes, I'd feel more obliged to mentioned it in the spec. Meanwhile, if you want to make a concrete suggestion about text to add, I'm happy to look it over. > [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results > [2]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-whichlangs -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 18:47:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT