On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:10 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > A minor editorial issue: > > 8. The normative part of section 7 defines a URI variable "I" but never > references it: > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#agt_obl > [[ > . . . given a URI I of an information resource IR . . . > ]] > > I suppose it doesn't do any real harm, except perhaps by being slightly > misleading by suggesting that the information resource must *have* a > URI. So whatever the editor decides to do about it is fine with me. Yes, that variable is spurious. We're taking it out. Sorry for the delay in responding; it took me a while to convince myself. I have made the change in the editor's draft Revision 1.264 2007/06/19 09:26:30 http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#agt_obl Please let us know whether this response addresses the comment to your satisfaction. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:29:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT