Re: Minor date fixes?

On 06/10/2006 08:50, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Oct 6, 2006, at 12:42 AM, John Breslin wrote:
>> In David example at http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/ and 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/david-erdf.html:
>>
>> <span class="cal-dtend" title="2006-10-13">12 October, 2006</span>
>>
>> should be 12th or 13th for both, and also:
> 
> Actually, that's as designed. According to RFC2445, the way
> to say that something ends on 12 October is to say dtend 2006-10-13.
> 
> See http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445#Vevent
> 
> And see also the example in hCalendar
>  <abbr class="dtend" title="2005-10-08">7</abbr>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar
> 
> It's perhaps worth explaining this detail. Ian, what do you think?
> 

Yes I think so, although a part of me wonders if this technicality might 
be distracting in the primer. We could probably avoid it by including 
times in the example to move the dtend away from midnight.

Ian