W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Minor date fixes?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:50:36 -0700
Message-Id: <13f6cf29e220879b3fef6b6363c158a9@w3.org>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
To: john.breslin@deri.org

On Oct 6, 2006, at 12:42 AM, John Breslin wrote:
> In David example at http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/ and 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/david-erdf.html:
>
> <span class="cal-dtend" title="2006-10-13">12 October, 2006</span>
>
> should be 12th or 13th for both, and also:

Actually, that's as designed. According to RFC2445, the way
to say that something ends on 12 October is to say dtend 2006-10-13.

See http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445#Vevent

And see also the example in hCalendar
  <abbr class="dtend" title="2005-10-08">7</abbr>
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar

It's perhaps worth explaining this detail. Ian, what do you think?

Thanks for reading so carefully and sending comments, John.

> <span class="cal-dtend"  title="2007-01-11">10th</span>
> should be the 10th or 11th for both (unless there's some time zone 
> difference thing going on :)).


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 07:50:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:42 GMT