- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:51:30 +0000
- To: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>, Gofran Shakair <gofran.shukair@deri.org>
- CC: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 08/03/2013 11:51, Hadley Beeman wrote: > Thanks, Bernadette! > > Sandro, how should we deal with these procedurally? For our deliverables that aren't rec-track or working group notes (e.g., the Community Directory, People ontology, possibly the Cookbook), what is the best way for us to say, "We've finished this. Here you go, world!" ? > > Also, Phil, how do you want to proceed with tying up loose ends around ADMS? My plan is that between now and Monday afternoon I will be looking at ADMS, seeking out relevant e-mails and issues, and creating an updated version of the editors draft. I will then ask the WG for consensus on allowing that to be published as a WG Note. If approved, my guess is that that will be the end of the matter although Notes can always be updated if desired. As for timing - I have to present 'what the W3C GLD is doing with ADMS' at a relevant workshop on Wednesday in Brussels (and I'm speaking in Amsterdam on a different subject entirely on Tuesday, hence my ridiculous timeline). So, from this week on, ADMS will be available for you to schedule on a call as you wish. > > Cheers, > > Hadley > > On 7 Mar 2013, at 21:11, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > >> Hi, >> See inline below: >> >> On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In organising the GLD wiki, I've made a few assumptions that I can't trace back to meeting minutes. >>> >>> My assumptions are: >>> >>> 1. DCAT UCR is a working group note. [1] >>> 2. ORG last call will end just before the F2F3, on 10 April. [2] >>> 3. The Community Directory will be 'transitioned' like a working group note, meaning: launched by resolution of the group. [3] >> Not exactly. It is a working website already. We're improving it. It needs to have a succession plan as Sandro correctly highlighted today. A community group seems as a good an approach as any. >> >>> 4. ADMS will be published as a working group note, since the group's work on it has ended. [4] >> I think Phil needs to be the internal champion of this effort to make this happen in remaining months.... >> >>> 5. People will be published as a working group note, since the group's work on it has ended. [5] >> No, People isn't going to progress to a WG Note. With Michael no longer in the WG, it doesn't have a champion to get to WG Note status AFAIK. >> >> Cheers, >> Bernadette >> >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_UCR_Timetable >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Timetable >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Community_Directory_Timetable >>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ADMS_Timetable >>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/People_Timetable >>> >>> >>> Hadley Beeman >>> Co-chair >>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group >>> >>> >>> >>> Hadley Beeman >>> LinkedGov - Technology Strategy Board >>> hadley@linkedgov.org >>> hadley.beeman@tsb.gov.uk >>> 07768 711478 >>> >>> >> > > > Hadley Beeman > LinkedGov - Technology Strategy Board > hadley@linkedgov.org > hadley.beeman@tsb.gov.uk > 07768 711478 > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 11:52:14 UTC