W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: ISSUE-23: How to relate a person to a building/room? [People]

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:07:16 +0000
Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E8B7E802-C491-453F-939B-656E7BCD2979@deri.org>
To: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>

Stasinos,

Thanks for your question.


> What is the use case for this?


For example, we use it in http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/deri- 
rooms ...


> I mean, how is this different from
> representing contact information for a person (ISSUE 24)?


See [1] - in a sense an extension of contact information with  
potentially finer granular descriptions than an address.

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/people/ 
index.html#relating-a-person-to-a-building-or-room
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 30 Jan 2012, at 07:02, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:

> Michael, all,
>
> What is the use case for this? I mean, how is this different from
> representing contact information for a person (ISSUE 24)?
>
> Best,
> Stasinos
>
>
> On 29 January 2012 13:07, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> ISSUE-23: How to relate a person to a building/room? [People]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/23
>>
>> Raised by: Michael Hausenblas
>> On product: People
>>
>> There are really two issues here, namely how to represent buildings  
>> and rooms  and how to relate a person to the building/room. It  
>> seems that the Buildings and Rooms Vocabulary [1] would in fact be  
>> capable to do this, however the namespace is sub-optimal, in terms  
>> of stability.
>>
>> [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/rooms#
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 30 January 2012 07:07:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 June 2013 15:04:56 UTC