- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:17:15 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
Ivan, Bernadette, I think there may be some confusion here :) Bernadette was asking about the linked data glossary by which I think she meant [a]. The link to org was probably just a cut/paste error. The ontologies will in fact be rec track documents, not just Notes. Dave [a] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html On 16/08/12 16:35, Ivan Herman wrote: > Bernadette, > > my personal preference would very clearly go for a W3C WG Note. It may only be me, but a W3C Note gives me the feeling of something more stable or at least more mature (even if I *know* that this is a note, it can be updated at any time, etc), whereas a wiki page is, well, something that looks as if it was just being worked on. > > As far as I could see, the ontology itself is in www.w3.org/ns, which is perfect. We could do a redirection, namely that a request for HTML would go to the Note, whereas a request in turtle or rdf/xml would lead to the RDF/OWL code. > > If you really really want to be nice, then the HTML code for the Note could be in RDFa, automatically generating the OWL file in turtle or RDF/XML, but would just be the cherry on the cake...:-) > > I hope this helps > > Ivan > > On Aug 16, 2012, at 17:28 , Bernadette Hyland wrote: > >> Hi Ivan, >> During today's Gov Linked Data working group we discussed the need to put the finishing touches on a Linked Data glossary [1], give it a nice URL and publish it. I'm keen to get this wrapped up asap, so hopefully this is a quick multiple choice question (A, B or C below). >> >> NB: The target audience for this glossary are IT managers and developers who are coming up the learning curve on Linked Data. It is not intended as an academic resource. I planning to add links to other glossary terms and will happily fold in feedback from anyone who can improve it. >> >> Quick background: >> >> Back in April I took the action to seed the glossary with support from Ghislain Atemezing. That is done now & we have approximately 90 terms with definitions. When I put up the page as a W3C ED, I did so because that was the framework with which I was familiar. I have no preference one way or the other regarding it being a Working Note or on the W3 wiki, I just want to see it a) on the w3.org domain; and 2) be of good quality and consistency. It would be nice if more people than the editors can update it over time too. >> >> My question to you is, where is it best published? >> A) On w3.org site as a Working Note >> B) On http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki >> C) some other suggestion >> >> --> Please advise. >> >> >> PS. In due course we'll link to the glossary on linkeddata.org [2] (which Tom Heath maintains) and vice versa. I've asked Tom to review our glossary and provide any feedback/updates. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bernadette Hyland, co-chair >> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group >> Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ >> >> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/index.html >> [2] http://linkeddata.org/glossary (The linkeddata.org guys have the coolest URL IMO) >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 16:18:00 UTC