- From: Ulrich <ulrich.atz@theodi.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:54:11 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-gld-comments@w3.org, Jeni Tennison <jeni@theodi.org>
Dave, yes your changes make sense. Many thanks, Ulrich On 14 May 2013, at 08:45, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > Sorry to hassle you, but it would be really helpful if you were able to let us know if this response was acceptable to you. > > Best wishes, > Dave > > On 09/05/13 14:38, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> Hi Ulrich, >> >> Thank you again for your comments on the Data Cube Last Call draft. >> >> I just wanted to follow up our discussion to let you know we have made >> the editorial changes we discussed. Details below. The current editor's >> draft is at [1]. >> >> Please can you let us know if you are satisfied with this response. >> >> On 08/04/13 17:54, Ulrich wrote: >>> Overall: yes the comments are editorial and aimed at helping newcomers >>> such myself grasp the concept. All your comments I don't address >>> specifically are fine and make sense. >> >> Thanks. >> >>> To ease understanding, the most effective change I suggest is moving the >>> part of section 7 without sub-heading forward. >> >> Good suggestion, done. >> >> On 05/04/13 12:13, Ulrich wrote: >> > * Link to the SDMX User Guide 2.1, especially /2.2 Background/ eases >> > understanding for newcomers. >> >> DONE Added reference within introductory section on SDMX. >> >> > * Make examples earlier. >> >> Added a complete RDF rendering of the running example as an Appendix >> and linked that from section (now) 5.4. >> >> > * I'd recommend avoiding the term "non-statistical data" as I have >> > /only/ heard it in the context of official statistics. Or what >> > exactly makes data statistical? (see e.g. section 5.1) >> >> DONE (removed use of the term) >> >> > * The slice example is good, but could do with a shorter sentence. >> >> Fixed. >> >> > * Example 5.3 -- /can we have some actual final code in there? /Even >> > if it anticipates some sections. >> >> Done via the new appendix with a forward reference. >> >> > * Example 6.3 I find it hard to see where we define the nested >> > structure of the data - include reference to example 4 or call it >> > something more telling than "example". >> >> Retitled. >> >> >> Best wishes, >> Dave >> >> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html >> >
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 10:55:02 UTC