W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2008

Re: The Geolocation API must provide location data in terms of a pair of latitude and longitude coordinates.

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:58:56 +0100
Message-ID: <708552fb0806250958l5f054838je75125f1da514c8a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alan McNamara" <alan.mcnamara@badja.com>
Cc: public-geolocation@w3.org

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Alan McNamara <alan.mcnamara@badja.com> wrote:
> I am not a GIS expert, but my GIS friends constantly remind me that there
> is no such thing as latitude and longitude.  Such numbers are dependent on
> the geodetic system used.

That's correct.

> Futher, the draft arbitarily uses wgs84 for altitude, so it may be that
> this is also intended to be used for latitude and longitude.

That's true. I'll update the standard to reflect this. Note that it's
not arbitrarily used, though: all GPS APIs we've looked at so far only
use WGS84.

> This would
> not be acceptable in Australia, for example.  In New South Wales, and
> Australian state, all candastre (land) data is supplied in a couple of
> Australian standard.  So wgs84 locations would not correctly show which
> street you were standing.
> I suggest the standard needs to require the inclusion of the geodetic
> system.  The standard may need to propose a list of supported geodetic
> systems.

Maybe it's enough to just say that we only support WGS84? If your data
set uses a different geodetic system, you could convert to it from
WGS84, right?

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 16:59:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:49 UTC