Hi Aaron, On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com> wrote: > > The draft says that in case of a fatal error, watch should stop firing > callbacks. In case of a temporary error, it should continue. It's not > clear what "stop" means. Do I still have to call clearWatch()? Yes, you do. > I think > the behavior should be the same no matter what kind of error. Since > there can be temporary errors, I think it makes sense that callbacks > continue. Of course, it's up to the implementation to determine at > what rate, so it could be that they stop for all intents and purposes. Yes, that's what I meant. I'll reword that section to make it clear. > But it's still on the developer to clearWatch() eventually. Agreed. Many thanks, AndreiReceived on Monday, 23 June 2008 19:34:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:54:07 GMT