On Aug 11, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Chris Butler <cbutler@dash.net> > wrote: >> Hi Andrei. >> >> I think there was consensus that we should have timeouts as part of >> the >> API as an error scenario with the ability to set the timeout period. >> >> Was there something I missed that was a strong argument against? >> > > I wasn't sure there was consensus, since there was the argument that > you could achieve the same functionality using window.setTimeout(). > However, I do agree with you that allowing the developer to specify a > timeout via PositionOptions is a nice-to-have feature. Does anyone > strongly disagree with adding this to the spec? > > Andrei You can not support this functionality with window.setTimeout() unless getCurrentPosition returns something that is cancelable. I think this is a good addition. We can support this via a new error code on PositionError. Regards, DougReceived on Monday, 11 August 2008 21:10:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:54:07 GMT