W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: comments on Matrix

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:51:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBTtznXMfqMifnftHaU+h4TYA8DPRgkhrRD+YOpZ0d4pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> Why didn't you object to SVG 1.1 :).

That's a little old for me.  ^_^

> To be honest, SVGMatrix is the only reason why I added this exception to the Matrix Interface in the first place. Even so, what do you return when you do not throw? A matrix with a bunch of NaN as suggested by Benoit? Even if all attributes are restricted doubles?

Yeah, I suspect that would work, as long as the other matrix
operations are defines to work with NaN corruption sanely.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 18:52:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 21 March 2013 18:52:21 GMT