W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [filter-effects] New syntax proposal for 'custom' filter function

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:51:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDG3D2YNMS-QHa47rU03=nXGukbmfJe06jzPa=nofGkMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM, David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Just checked, animations use IDENT :P. I definitely don't want a
> different syntax for custom() then for animation-name/@keyframes. So yes,
> IDENT is fine for me (no quotes).
>
> What Accept header will be sent for HTTP requests of shaders with
> "format" "glsl"?


I believe we haven't specified about that.
The shader programs are currently downloaded as text. Do you think the
programs should be requested for mime types x-shader/x-vertex or
x-shader/x-fragment?
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 04:52:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 November 2012 04:52:06 GMT