W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [filter-effects] New syntax proposal for 'custom' filter function

From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:30:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWM5Txv_fBiQUH+JszxeJNQ4gZxT5gc5YqHs1_qghtG4uD22g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> Just checked, animations use IDENT :P. I definitely don't want a different syntax for custom() then for animation-name/@keyframes. So yes, IDENT is fine for me (no quotes).

What Accept header will be sent for HTTP requests of shaders with
"format" "glsl"?

David
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 01:31:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 November 2012 01:31:24 GMT