W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > February 2012

Re: AVT in XForms 2.0 RNC

From: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:24:55 -0800
Message-ID: <4F2C5EB7.8090409@xerox.com>
To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
CC: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>
On 02/02/2012 12:38 PM, Nick Van den Bleeken wrote:
> Leigh,
>
>> 2. I didn't put AVT on @ref or @nodeset because it wasn't clear to me 
>> which we were doing and which we weren't
> both ref and nodeset contain path expressions and therefore don't 
> support AVTs by definition (from the spec: Curly brackets are not 
> treated specially in an attribute value in an XForms document if the 
> attribute doesn't support attribute value templates or if the content 
> model of the attribute is already an expression.)

OK, that's what I did in the RNC as well; if it was already an XPath 
expression I didn't make it be AVT.

>> 3. I asked a question about adding header/@name and header/@value and 
>> have added them in to the RNC for now.
>>    Note that header/@value is slightly different from 
>> header/value/@value because you can have multiple header/value[] 
>> elements.
> I think we should not add a name and value attribute to the header 
> element.
>
It would be good to discuss this in the group.


> Kind regards,
>
> Nick Van den Bleeken
> R&D Manager
>
> Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
> Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71
> nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com 
> <mailto:nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
> www.inventivedesigners.com
>
>
>
> On 01 Feb 2012, at 23:13, Leigh L Klotz Jr wrote:
>
>> I've added a first draft of AVT support in the XForms 2.0 RNC schema 
>> as asked in this action:
>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/1852
>>
>> 1. I didn't verify every attribute agains the specification
>> 2. I didn't put AVT on @ref or @nodeset because it wasn't clear to me 
>> which we were doing and which we weren't
>> 3. I asked a question about adding header/@name and header/@value and 
>> have added them in to the RNC for now.
>>    Note that header/@value is slightly different from 
>> header/value/@value because you can have multiple header/value[] 
>> elements.
>>
>> Leigh.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
> http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 22:25:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:56 UTC