W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Fw: xsd:normalizedString

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:39:57 -0700
Message-ID: <e81b48eb0910271339s72f05efft48654eb2637c2456@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-forms@w3.org
I have some feedback from Eric van der Vlist as well, maybe we can briefly
discuss during tomorrow's call.

-Erik

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:42 PM, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> Testing...
>
> ----- Forwarded by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM on 10/27/2009 12:42 PM -----
>  From: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM To: public-forms@w3.org Date: 10/27/2009
> 11:35 AM Subject: xsd:normalizedString
> ------------------------------
>
>
> With respect to the action item on myself and Erik to investigate
> xsd:normalizedString due to an email [1] to the group, I checked with C. M.
> Sperberg-McQueen and Noah Mendelsohn, whose answers were consistent.
>  Net-net, whether or not the tests of normalizedString are correct depends
> on a decision we have not really made about how to consume XML Schema.
> Michael commented that it is unfortunate there is no list of "things to
> consider" when consuming schema into another technology.  However, in this
> case both he and Noah indicated that a schema technology consumer is much
> more likely to agree with the authors of [1] that the "invalid" case is not
> invalid because the strings are normalized before validity checking because
> this makes it easier to simply consume a COTS schema engine.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Sep/0008.html
>
> Cheers,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> Blog RSS feed:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 20:40:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:52 UTC