Hi Steven, In the telecon today, we were unable to get back around to the topic after the beginning of the call, but with respect to your proposed feedback here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Mar/0012.html Nick and I both felt that in principle the backwards compatibility argument was a good piece of feedback. I wondered, however, at what a resulting change would look like. Would the behavior of unqualified names seem bizarre or unnatural to namespace-aware authors? A few code examples might clarify quickly whether it "feels right". Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdwReceived on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:28:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:28:05 GMT