Re: On privacy and cloud services

+1

Dan

From: Ben Werdmuller <ben@benwerd.com<mailto:ben@benwerd.com>>
Date: Friday, 7 June 2013 17:43
To: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com<mailto:evan@e14n.com>>
Cc: "public-fedsocweb@w3.org<mailto:public-fedsocweb@w3.org>" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org<mailto:public-fedsocweb@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: On privacy and cloud services
Resent-From: <public-fedsocweb@w3.org<mailto:public-fedsocweb@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, 7 June 2013 17:43


Although I bet there is a consensus, there might also be more of an effect if we *all* go and make statements that discuss the potential benefits of federation / ownership in this context? Optionally, perhaps linking to the chair's statement to show support. Just a thought.


Ben Werdmuller
<http://goog_1933028737>
benwerd.com<http://benwerd.com> | werd.io<http://werd.io>

+1 (312) 488-9373


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com<mailto:evan@e14n.com>> wrote:
On 13-06-07 10:10 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Within the last few days security and privacy aspects have become
significantly more important for a large part of the population both
within the U.S. and outside.

These aspects therefore have become more important for the work of this
community group.

Maybe it makes sense to draft a brief W3C Federated Social Web Community
Group statement ?

Cheers,
Andreas
I think it might be better to just post something personally as the chair on the blog. That avoids the necessity of getting consensus.

-Evan