- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:56:58 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7X-qKqX8xJ43A-YggB7-q1se3QL4Adgan0gUvKXnTwXGA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Antoine While you're at it, here is a couple of things I spotted while working on a translation of the recommendation : - Exemple 77 uses "love"@fr while it should be "amour"@fr; - Section C5 states : "This RDF schema document expresses the SKOS vocabulary" while I think it should read "This RDF schema document expresses the SKOS*-XL* vocabulary"; - S48 and S58 are categorized in "Class and Property Definitions", but they are expressing "disjointWith" relationships. Shouldn't they belong to an "integrity condition" section like the other "disjointWith" statements in the recommendation ? Cheers Thomas 2013/6/28 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> > Dear Todd, > > This is certainly the right place for bug reports, and huge thanks for > spending the time to look and report! > I'm going to ask whether we can make a quick update on the schema file. > This is a small bug fix that does not change anything in the formal > semantics of the ontology, thus I believe we should be able to proceed with > it relatively easily. > > Best regards, > > Antoine > > > > My apologies if this is not the right place for bug reports. >> >> This is in reference to the file from http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-** >> reference/skos.rdf <http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos.rdf> that >> the SKOS RDF Vocabularies page, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/**skos/vocabs<http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/vocabs>, >> says is the current RDF vocabulary for SKOS in RDF. >> >> Inside that file, I believe that the concept skos:narrower mistakenly has >> the same scopeNote as skos:broader. I imagine the correct version should >> say: >> >> "By convention, skos:narrower is only used to assert an immediate (i.e. >> direct) hierarchical link between two conceptual resources." >> >> The current version says: >> >> "By convention, skos:broader is only used to assert an immediate (i.e. >> direct) hierarchical link between two conceptual resources." >> >> Here is the rdf:Description from skos.rdf: >> >> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#narrower"> >> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has narrower</rdfs:label> >> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.** >> org/2004/02/skos/core <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core>"/> >> <skos:definition xml:lang="en">Relates a concept to a concept that >> is more specific in meaning.</skos:definition> >> <skos:scopeNote xml:lang="en">By convention, skos:broader is only >> used to assert an immediate (i.e. direct) hierarchical link between two >> conceptual resources.</skos:scopeNote> >> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Narrower concepts are typically rendered >> as children in a concept hierarchy (tree).</rdfs:comment> >> <!-- S18 --> >> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.** >> org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty> >> **"/> >> <!-- S22 --> >> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#**narrowerTransitive"/> >> <!-- S25 --> >> <owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="#broader"/> >> <!-- For non-OWL aware applications --> >> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.** >> org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#**Property<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property> >> "/> >> </rdf:Description> >> >> Best regards, >> Todd >> >> >> -- >> Todd DeLuca >> Scientific Programmer >> Wall Lab, CBMI, Harvard Medical School >> http://todddeluca.com >> http://wall..hms.harvard.edu/ <http://wall.hms.harvard.edu/> >> >> > > -- * * *Thomas Francart* - Sparna Consultant Indépendant Data, Sémantique, Contenus, Connaissances web : http://sparna.fr, blog : http://francart.fr Tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97 Fax : +33 (0)9.58.16.17.14 Skype : francartthomas
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 20:00:15 UTC