W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Paper - key choices in the design of SKOS

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:39:21 -0400
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: brian.matthews@stfc.ac.uk, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130712133921.GA73591@julius.local>
Hi Brian,

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:28:26PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Well spotted, and thanks for the corrective action!
> Unfortunately now I think we can't change the paper any more.
> 
> On the other hand, it's maybe a problem on the JODI side. http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/ is not working anymore.
> And it must have been fairly recent. Publishers check that kind of thing when they edit the last version to be published...

The paper cites [1], which resolves to a table of contents of the Jodi issue
with abstracts.  There is an abstract there, with a link to the Limber paper
("Having the right connections") [2].  That link resolves to a Jodi page with
the title "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems: introduction to a special
issue", but that page that only provides a link back to [3].

By a Google search, I find the February 2001 Jodi article "Having the Right
Connections: the LIMBER Project" at [4].

I note that the metadata for Issue 32 [5] gives the identifier of that issue as
[6], which resolves to a Jodi page titled "Networked Knowledge Organization
Systems: introduction to a special issue" and linking back to [3].

I find the abstract of "Having the Right Connections at [7] and the metadata
at [8].

I find both of these links [1,4] in the notes used for writing the History
section.  We (the authors) were pretty careful about clicking on the links in
the proofs, and as Antoine points out, publishers check that sort of thing too.
It is possible that we neglected to try clicking through to [2].

I will drop a line to the editors of Jodi suggesting they correct the link on
[1], which currently points to [2] (a broken link), to point instead to [4] (or
its hdl.handle.net equivalent).

Thank you for flagging this!
Tom

[1] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33
[2] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/hdl.handle.net/1969.2/jodi-31
[3] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/33
[4] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/34/35
[5] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/32/33
[6] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32
[7] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/34
[8] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/34/35



Brian writes:
> >Interesting to see this!
> >
> >For the historically minded, I see that the Limber paper in Jodi is referred to: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33
> >This no longer seems to be available (or not correctly linked), so I have put this into our institutional repository at
> >http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=28966
> >
> >(though the paper at this Open University workshop http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=29055 talked more about the
> >RDF thesaurus at that time, and the full Liimber schema ended up in the SWAD-Europe report http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/8.2/ )
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Brian
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl]
> >Sent: 04 July 2013 17:04
> >To: SKOS
> >Subject: Paper - key choices in the design of SKOS
> >
> >Dear all,
> >
> >You may be interested in a paper published last month by the Journal of Web Semantics, looking back at many years of work on SKOS:
> >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.001
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Antoine
> >
> 

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 13:39:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:17 UTC