The excellent "SKOS Primer" has one sentence in it which may be misleading. When discussing owl:imports, it states: "In particular, there is no logical dependency between skos:inScheme and owl:imports: the use of owl:imports will not result in the presence of any additional skos:inScheme statements." Well, no. It might, if the imported file itself contained some skos:inScheme statements. What is meant here, as becomes clear when one follows the example given, is that if A imports B, then the triples in B should not be counted as being skos:inScheme in scheme A. A minor point, but it caught my attention because when I read this for the first time (carelessly) it seemed like SKOS was denying the OWL semantics for owl:imports. Pat Hayes ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Monday, 23 February 2009 17:34:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:45 GMT