Stephen Bounds wrote: > > But to me, the argument is about the primary use case of SKOS. If SKOS > is first and foremost designed as a thesaurus interchange language, then > it's essential that <skos:broader> be non-transitive (see the > polyhierarchy example I gave to Simon for an illustration of why). I believe the purpose of SKOS is first and foremost to enable publishing a simple KOS on the Web, motivated especially by the desire to serve the Semantic Web. If you want a format for exchanging thesauri, what about the DD8723-5 format (aka BS8723 format) which you can see at http://schemas.bs8723.org/ ? Its data model is not so very different from that of SKOS. Stella ***************************************************** Stella Dextre Clarke Information Consultant Luke House, West Hendred, Wantage, OX12 8RR, UK Tel: 01235-833-298 Fax: 01235-863-298 stella@lukehouse.org *****************************************************Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:37:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:29 GMT