W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2008

Re: [ISSUE-77] [ISSUE-48] Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Skos subject properties are deprecated

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:42:34 +0000
Cc: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-Id: <968A2DC0-3D05-46A6-A1D3-1EB0643F6C66@cyganiak.de>
To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>

On 24 Jan 2008, at 15:26, Simon Spero wrote:
>> Like skos:subject, dcterms:subject seems to be intended for use on  
>> documents, not people or cities. Hence it doesn't really meet  
>> DBpedia's requirements.
> The meaning of "document" in this context is extremely broad;  if we  
> follow  Otlet's definition of a document as anything which can  
> convey information to an observer(Buckland 1997),  the term would  
> seem to cover anything which can have a subject.
> By this standard, timbl is a document, but only when someone's  
> looking.

Sorry, but you lost me there. Where I live, people are not documents,  
and I like it here.


> Simon
> Buckland, Michael K. “What is a ?document.” Journal of the American  
> Society for Information Science 48, no. 9 (1997): 804-809.   http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~buckland/whatdoc.html
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:42:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:59 GMT