In litteris suis de Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 14:58, public-esw-thes-request@w3.org <>scripsit: > At 11:07 AM 1/10/2008, Bernard Vatant wrote: >> OK Daniel, let me have another try if you don't mind :-) >>> >>> From my point of view, it does NOT make sense that skos:narrower >>> and broader are not transitive. >>> And if applications can go ahead and make them transitive by >>> expanding how they wish, that violates the asserted SKOS semantics. >>> Unless I'm misunderstanding something here, this sounds like a >>> formula for chaos. I know we're currently finialising the spec, but anyhow: We could invent two new properties skos:broaderTransitive (a subproperty of skos:broader) and skos:narrowerTransitive (a subproperty of skos:narrower) which both are declared as transitive. Could this be a solution? All the best, Lars -- Dr. Lars G. Svensson Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Informationstechnik Adickesallee 1 60322 Frankfurt http://www.d-nb.de/Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 07:47:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:59 GMT