- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:34:54 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl>
- CC: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, > Well there is a point in what Bernard says: if you aim at some standard > it's better if people are convinced there is nothing like a monster in > the closet ;-) Agreed. So who can spot a monster? > So keeping simple and keeping the door open for extensions, yes. Keeping In which case you need a skos:Term class. BTW there was a reconciliary proposal by Dan Brickley to indeed use the more complex model but provide a rule set with which you can automatically convert to the simpler (current) model. But I don't know if that would be useful as the conversion would probably be difficult the other way around. > I think that in the process of that I will try to give references to > existing cases where these links would be useful. This may include some Look at all the places where WordNet is used :-) A Term class basically means starting to use a model very similar to WordNet's. > also try to mine the old mails of this list, where this subject has > already been debated as Mark recalls. So if you have examples to feed us See [1,2,3]. Mark. [1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals.html#thesaurusRepresentation-11 [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2006May/0009.html [3]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2005Nov/0000.html
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 13:34:59 UTC