W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Comments on SKOS Core Guide & Quick Guide

From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:53:00 +0100
Message-ID: <41F608EC.5010300@cs.vu.nl>
To: Stella Dextre Clarke <sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk>
CC: "'Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)'" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org

Maybe it would be useful to give an example in the Guide from one of 
these thesauri to illustrate why SKOS should allow both props to 
co-occur (or are there cases of thesauri which SKOS explicitly should 
not cover).


> definition will not co-occur. I know of some scholarly thesauri which
> give definitions from 3 or more sources (usually all differing), as well
> as a scope note, for a single descriptor. The key point  is that the

  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        mark@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2005 08:53:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:05 UTC