W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2005

Re: 'extending' SKOS Core

From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:55:31 +0100
Message-ID: <41F61793.8080001@cs.vu.nl>
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
CC: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "Thomas Baker (E-mail)" <thomas.baker@BI.FHG.DE>


Hi Alistair,

Using the word "refinement" for extensions in terms of sub-props and 
sub-classes sounds fine (i.e. not ambiguous) to me personally.

Mark.

> However I use the words 'extending' and 'extensible' as buzzwords for
> talking about SKOS Core, because this feature of RDF (i.e. 'extension' via
> sub-prop & sub-class) is a major selling point for SKOS Core.  It means that
> SKOS Core can be a standard representation framework for KOS that doesn't
> break when you try to represent slightly quirky KOS.  You get
> interoperability without having to sacrifice flexibility.  People in the KOS
> community respond very well to this feature I have found.
> 
> Not sure what to do about this to avoid the potential ambiguity Tom
> describes.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Al.
> 

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        mark@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2005 09:55:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:53 GMT