W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Subdivision of Concept Schemes

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:03:22 +0100
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GOEIKOOAMJONEFCANOKCEEOPFJAA.bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>


> I had thought about something like this, but wasn't sure if it should be done
> with new vocab in SKOS Core, or with existing vocab from elsewhere.  There is
> the dc:isPartOf / dc:hasPart property pair.  There is also the option to
> declare classes of concepts as OWL restrictions on the skos:inScheme property
> (as you did in another email) and declare one class to be a subclass of another.

Good remarks. Indeed I'd rather buy the latter solution. BTW do you think it would be a
good idea to somehow document such (best) practices when using OWL along with SKOS? And
where? In the SKOS-Core guide? or in some other note?



Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Knowledge Engineering

"Making Sense of Content" :  http://www.mondeca.com
"Everything is a Subject" :  http://universimmedia.blogspot.com

Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 16:03:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:05 UTC