W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > February 2005

Re: Question on skos:subject domain

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:45:46 +0100
To: "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Message-ID: <opsmn06kttw5l938@saturne>

This makes good sense to me.

Chaals

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:55:29 +0100, Bernard Vatant  
<bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote:

>
>
> I also agree on leaving the skos:subject domain open. Seems to me that  
> SKOS should be
> agnostic on the many possible ways concepts and concept schemes can be  
> used for indexing,

> IMO no general inference on the class of a:foo should be possible from a  
> general assertion

> I rather imagine the use of owl:Restriction to define that such type of  
> resource is using
> such concept scheme, like e.g.
>
> Definition of eg:TechnicalConcept as the subClass of skos:Concept for  
> which skos:inScheme
> value is eg:TechnicalTerminology

> Definition of eg:TechnicalDocument as class of resources being indexed  
> by some
> eg:TechnicalConcept
>
>> From such declarations, I could e.g. entail that a given resource is a  
>> TechnicalDocument,
> from the fact that it is indexed on a TechnicalConcept.
>
> Does that make sense?

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile - Vice Presidente - Fundacion Sidar
charles@sidar.org                      http://www.sidar.org
     (chaals is available for consulting at the moment)
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 19:54:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:53 GMT