Re: [Proposal][SKOS-Core] skos:denotes

* Miles, AJ (Alistair)  <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-09-29 16:20+0100]
> 
> What if the definition of 'skos:denotes' was something like ...
> 
> 'The OWL Individual or Class that this concept corresponds to.' 

We could drop 'OWL' there, since this works for generic RDF/RDFS too.

It puts a lot of work onto the word 'corresponds', but I could live with
this. 

cheers,

Dan