W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > October 2004

Re: search labels

From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:33:38 +0200
Message-ID: <416F7D52.7040707@gnowsis.com>
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
CC: "'Houghton,Andrew'" <houghtoa@oclc.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
In my bookmarks in mozilla it says somehting like
"keywords"
so would this be a better idea for a skos:keywords thing?

regards
Leo



Es begab sich aber zu der Zeit 14.10.2004 19:37,  da Miles, AJ 
(Alistair) schrieb:

>Hi Andy,
>
>Yes, I was thinking that 'skos:searchLabel' would be a sub-property of
>rdfs:label.
>
>Al.
>
>---
>Alistair Miles
>Research Associate
>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>Building R1 Room 1.60
>Fermi Avenue
>Chilton
>Didcot
>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
>United Kingdom
>Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
>
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
>>[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Houghton,Andrew
>>Sent: 14 October 2004 18:20
>>To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
>>Subject: RE: search labels
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Stella Dextre Clarke [mailto:sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk] 
>>>Sent: 14 October, 2004 13:00
>>>Subject: RE: search labels
>>>
>>>
>>>Could be useful. Mis-spellings can be useful to assist search 
>>>(provided they are common, unambiguous and distinctive, 
>>>unlikely to be confused with another preferred term. See our 
>>>draft BS8723 Part 2) and it is good to be able to keep them 
>>>separate from normal non-preferred terms Stella
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org
>>>[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ
>>>(Alistair)
>>>Sent: 14 October 2004 17:17
>>>To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
>>>Subject: search labels
>>>
>>>This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g.
>>>'searchLabel' that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user
>>>search, where you
>>>*don't* want those labels to appear among the 
>>>      
>>>
>>meaning-defining set of
>>    
>>
>>>labels for that concept.  This could be used e.g. for common
>>>mis-spellings of another label.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I assume that if this proposal were to go forward that 
>>skos:searchLabel
>>would become a sub-property of rdfs:label as is skos:prefLabel and 
>>skos:altLabel.  Would you want to distinguish between labels that
>>were part of the thesaurus proper or not?  This might indicate another
>>abstract level like:
>>
>>rdfs:label
>>  skos:inThesaurusLabel
>>    skos:prefLabel
>>    skos:altLabel
>>  skos:nonThesaurusLabel
>>    skos:searchLabel
>>
>>I used skos:inThesaurusLabel and skos:nonThesaurusLabel as abstract
>>types and am not suggesting these names.
>>
>>So the question in my mind is: would you want this level of 
>>abstraction
>>or is making skos:searchLabel a sub-property of rdfs:label sufficient?
>>
>>
>>Andy.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 07:33:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:04 UTC