W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > November 2004

RE: SKOS dodges the identity crisis?

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:17:41 +0200
Message-ID: <1E4A0AC134884349A21955574A90A7A56473EF@trebe051.ntc.nokia.com>
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) 
> Sent: 19 November, 2004 15:08
> To: 'ext Miles, AJ (Alistair)'; 'www-rdf-interest@w3.org';
> 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
> Subject: RE: SKOS dodges the identity crisis?
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Miles, AJ
> > (Alistair)
> > Sent: 18 November, 2004 20:46
> > To: 'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'; 'public-esw-thes@w3.org'
> > Subject: SKOS dodges the identity crisis?
> > 
> > 
> ...
> 
> > We really have to get this sorted.
> 
> I suggest you follow Dublin Core's exemplary lead and use
> URIs without fragment identifiers to identify your terms.
> You'll be in very good company, and such an approach is
> fully compatible with the PR version of AWWW and every
> semantic web spec produced by the W3C to date.

To be more specific, and more accurate regarding my
original meaning, I suggest that you use 'http:' URIs
without fragment identifiers to identify your terms.

Cheers,

Patrick
Received on Friday, 19 November 2004 14:22:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT