W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > December 2010

Re: eGov at W3C: Next Steps.

From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:19:51 -0500
Message-ID: <4D0A5847.8030600@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
CC: public-egov-ig@w3.org
Oh. data formats. Those are fine. I was thinking more along the lines 
of the oauth, atoca, ecrit, even dane and ltans ...


On 12/16/10 12:48 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams
> <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>  wrote:
>> What IETF work do you have in mind?
>
>> From the IETF there is a lot of relevant work on Atom [1,2,3], JSON
> [4], geo-uris [5] to name a few. I could go on, but I think the W3C
> TAG work quite closely with IETF if that's some kind of precedent.
> OASIS was more just an example of another body that could be important
> to the eGov IG. I was mainly hoping that the eGov IG charter could be
> a bit more agnostic about what web technologies are relevant for
> discussion.
>
> //Ed
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5005
> [4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4627
> [5] http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 18:21:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 December 2010 18:21:05 GMT