- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:19:51 -0500
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- CC: public-egov-ig@w3.org
Oh. data formats. Those are fine. I was thinking more along the lines of the oauth, atoca, ecrit, even dane and ltans ... On 12/16/10 12:48 PM, Ed Summers wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams > <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote: >> What IETF work do you have in mind? > >> From the IETF there is a lot of relevant work on Atom [1,2,3], JSON > [4], geo-uris [5] to name a few. I could go on, but I think the W3C > TAG work quite closely with IETF if that's some kind of precedent. > OASIS was more just an example of another body that could be important > to the eGov IG. I was mainly hoping that the eGov IG charter could be > a bit more agnostic about what web technologies are relevant for > discussion. > > //Ed > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287 > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023 > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5005 > [4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4627 > [5] http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870 > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 18:21:05 UTC