W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed

From: Miguel A. Amutio Gómez <miguel.amutio@map.es>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:26:43 +0200
Message-ID: <49F07AA3.6080200@map.es>
To: "Ken Fischer ClickForHelp.com" <ken@clickforhelp.com>
CC: 'Catherine Roy' <croy@communautique.qc.ca>, "'Jose M. Alonso'" <josema@w3.org>, 'eGovIG' <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Hi Ken,

I had reworked the paragraph to distinguish between access options and 
availability:

"Governments should take into account distribution, access options and 
accessibility aspects to avoid creating new barriers which could limit 
the amount of information or services provided. Consideration to 
socially disadvantaged users, users without high bandwidth and high cost 
devices, as well as devices, platforms and websites with smaller 
audiences should be taken into account."


I think that with this wording it satisfies the ideas we want to express.

Best regards,
Miguel A.


Ken Fischer ClickForHelp.com escribió:
> Hi Miguel
> 	I has changed accessibility in my doc to availability to address
> Catherine's concerns over the wording. It seems that would work in the
> paragraph below better.
> 	Ken
>
> 7th paragraph:
>
> "Governments should clearly take into account distribution and 
> accessibility options which do not pose barriers which would result in a 
> decrease the amount of information distribution or services provided." 
> This phrase needs to be polished a bit but I am unclear what is meant by 
> "accessibility options". Could you please clarify ? Do you mean access 
> or accessibility ?
>
>
>
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 14:24:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 April 2009 14:24:41 GMT