Re: Proposed agenda for call on Tuesday

Hey Grisha,

ok, point has been added.

The meeting time should be 10 AM San Francisco on Tuesday 2017-07-11. This
translates to 1900 Berlin/Madrid on the same day.

I have not heard back on whether the call-in details from last time still
are valid. I hope we hear something about that in the next few hours.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Grisha Lyukshin <glyuk@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Johannes,
>
>
> Somehow, I lost meeting details. Could you please share it?
>
>
> Also, I wanted to add another item to the agenda:
>
>
> Need of rich content input in html controls(think of gifs insertion with a
> keyboard shortcut or through an IME). Is this something editors need/want?
> If so, how would you want it to be exposed to you? new element, new CE
> attribute value, etc?
>
>
> - Grisha
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* johanneswilm@gmail.com <johanneswilm@gmail.com> on behalf of
> Johannes Wilm <mail@johanneswilm.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:55:39 PM
> *To:* public-editing-tf@w3.org; Alexandre Elias
> *Subject:* Proposed agenda for call on Tuesday
>
> Hey,
> our monthly call is scheduled for Tuesday. Agenda items to look at so far:
>
> * Input Events, level 1:
> - What is the purpose of the deleteCompositionText input type? (Is there a
> purpose or was it left in by accident?) https://github.com/
> w3c/input-events/issues/66
>
> * Input Events, level 2:
> - Where should the normative list of the event order of an entire IME text
> editing operation live? (here or ui events)
>
> * Both:
> - How do we deal with beforeinput events for things like "intends to write
> subsequent text in bold" that don't yet cause a DOM change?
> https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/64
> - should uievents take our description of when a beforeinput event takes
> place, or do we need a different text? https://github.com/w3c/
> uievents/issues/145
>
> Other things:
> - Editing text in tables, are we ok with updating spec as requested in
> latest tickets at https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues or should we not
> bother with it?
>
>
> Please notify the list if you have more topics to discuss. Notice that I
> left out the issues brought up here about getting input events 1 get closer
> to 2, as that debate probably will last a lot longer.
>



-- 
Johannes Wilm
http://www.johanneswilm.org
tel: +1 (520) 399 8880