W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-earl10-comments@w3.org > May 2011

Bug 027: Defining Terms in Sections

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:32 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=L5DzfWvzgUhYGg9yR2-MOq6Ngvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-earl10-comments@w3.org
This is feedback on a Last Call Working Draft:

Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema
W3C Working Draft 10 May 2011

Peculiarly, the defined terms aren't linked to the URIs. In other
words, take the following URI:


This is ostensibly defined by § 2.1. Assertion Class:


But there is nothing in the RDF schema which links the term to the
specification, and there is nothing in the specification which states
that the documentation in § 2.1 defines the EARL vocabulary term in
the RDF schema.

There is no paper trail, in other words, to check the definitions in
either direction.

Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 16:53:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:39:58 UTC