- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:57:25 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
This was also commented on by Paul Walk: # Diagrams - relationships I find the diagrams quite difficult to understand. I think I'm unclear whether the diagrams represent entity relationships or object-oriented-hierarchies. These seem to be mixed together - for example the relationships between Standard and Profile. I guess it's not necessarily invalid for these to be mixed in this way, but I find it unusual and a little confusing. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jan/0006.html This references all of the diagrams. When they are all modified, he needs to be contacted to see if he feels his comment has been addressed. Please do not "due for closing" until others in the thread weigh in to say whether it resolves their concerns. My answer is this is much better, but the "OWL named individual" is unnecessary. The diagram is not specific to OWL. Also, I don't think this related to #791, which is about adding a role for mapping. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-470116410 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2019 13:57:26 UTC