Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)

@kcoyle  +1 to  "such that IF you wish certain functionality then you MUST provide a "hook" (URI) into the description that supports that functionality."

I'm not sure the second sentence is clear enough though - it sounds as though content negotiation might apply to the document /specification/portion itself - not to the set of data instances described by it, which is the real functionality described by conneg..

  

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1017#issuecomment-515666659 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 27 July 2019 08:29:42 UTC