public-dxwg-wg@w3.org from July 2019 by author

aisaac via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Conformance profiles (#1018) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• [dxwg] Two things that our profiles are not (#976) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran

• Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata (Tuesday, 2 July)

Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub

• [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Date/time clarification.. (#1012) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing syntax issues for issue 980 (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Links to ISO-19115-1... (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing feedback (in issue #935) (#986) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations (#981) (Saturday, 6 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing the Spanish translations (Friday, 5 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing the Spanish translations (Friday, 5 July)
• [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Friday, 5 July)
• [dxwg] Change owl:versionInfo (#979) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (#969) (Friday, 5 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961) (Monday, 1 July)

Andrea Perego via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Updates to ack section (#945) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Ack section updated (Tuesday, 30 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Ack section updated (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (#969) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ (#961) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Monday, 1 July)

Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Friday, 12 July)

Annette Greiner via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 3 July)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: Narrowing down profile definition choices (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles" (Tuesday, 2 July)
• EntitySchemas in Wikidata (Monday, 1 July)

Chris Mungall via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)

Chris Wood via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Thursday, 18 July)

Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)

• RE: Trying to articulate our various "profiles" (Wednesday, 3 July)

Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker

• dxwg-ACTION-354: Contact ralph swick about guidance on vocabulary versioning (Wednesday, 31 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-353: Ask annette_g about the small concerns she mentions in her reply to the dcat cr poll (Tuesday, 30 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-352: Ask plh about non-normative references (Tuesday, 30 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-351: Review antoine's comments and check if the 3pwd addresses them all (Thursday, 25 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-350: Issue a poll for voting on dcat (Tuesday, 23 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-349: Move text from ietf to conneg draft for #500 (Thursday, 11 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-348: Create pr with real examples to solve #287 (Thursday, 11 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-347: Create new gh issue explaining the problem of redirects and refer to that issue in the wd (Thursday, 11 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-346: Process w3cgeo point changes (Wednesday, 10 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-345: Draft response on language tags (Wednesday, 10 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-344: Draft response to renato on vcard issue (Wednesday, 10 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-343: Update qsa documentation with an equivalent to getcapabilities (Thursday, 4 July)
• dxwg-ACTION-342: Start a fresh gh issue. (Tuesday, 2 July)

David Browning via GitHub

• [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor text tidy... (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Minor text tidy... (#1023) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Minor text tidy... (#1023) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor text tidy... (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Figures format and legibility (#896) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Links across DCAT rec, rdf files and namespace pages (#377) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Updated namespace file (#881) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] Examples provide no language or direction metadata (#958) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Duplicated DATS bib entry (#895) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Harmonise notes about 'property/etc added in this revision of DCAT' (#923) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] 6.7.19 mention other data package formats (#973) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] vCard and FOAF? (#955) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Data/time clarification.. (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Data/time clarification.. (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Harmonise notes about 'property/etc added in this revision of DCAT' (#923) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] Examples provide no language or direction metadata (#958) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latitute and longitude (#974) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: ODRL CG review (#949) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Links to ISO-19115-1... (#1001) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Completing the Spanish translations + other fixes to dcat.ttl (#981) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Links to ISO-19115-1... (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968) (Thursday, 11 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Thursday, 11 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latitute and longitude (#974) (Thursday, 11 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Thursday, 11 July)

david.browning@refinitiv.com

• DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.31T20:00:00Z (Tuesday, 30 July)
• DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.24T20:00:00Z (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z (Thursday, 18 July)
• DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.17T20:00:00Z (Tuesday, 16 July)
• RE: DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.10T20:00:00Z (Thursday, 11 July)
• DCAT sub-group call 2019.07.10T20:00:00Z (Tuesday, 9 July)

Jakub Klímek via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Friday, 19 July)

Karen Coyle

• Fwd: Reminder: Limited W3C Staff availability week of August 5-9 (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01 (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-25T12:00Z (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Resolution from poll (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Poll on definition - please review (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: poll on 'profile' (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: poll on 'profile' (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: Poll on proposal for definition of 'profile' for use with CONNEG and DCAT (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Fwd: Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Extended (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles" (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: EntitySchemas in Wikidata (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: Narrowing down profile definition choices (Monday, 1 July)
• Narrowing down profile definition choices (Monday, 1 July)

Karen Coyle via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014) (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Sunday, 21 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)

Lars G. Svensson via GitHub

• [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html (Saturday, 13 July)
• [dxwg] Change all occurences of "Dublin Core Terms" to "DCMI Metadata Terms" in Conneg-by-AP (#992) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Monday, 1 July)

lars.svensson@web.de

• Aw: Re: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01 (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01 (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-25T12:00Z (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Fw: Agenda for CNEG meeting 2019-07-18 (Thursday, 18 July)
• Agenda for CNEG meeting 2019-07-18 (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Fw: Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-11 (Thursday, 11 July)
• Aw: DXWG priorities (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Agenda for CNEG Telecon 2019-07-11 (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Fw: Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-07-04T12:00:00Z (Thursday, 4 July)
• Aw: Re: Trying to articulate our various "profiles" (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-07-04T12:00:00Z (Wednesday, 3 July)

Linda van den Brink via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Tuesday, 2 July)

makxdekkers via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] vCard and FOAF? (#955) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Wednesday, 3 July)

Nicholas Car via GitHub

• [dxwg] Align all Link header requirements & examples (#1027) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 343 (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 343 (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Tuesday, 30 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation (#594) (Monday, 29 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation (#594) (Monday, 29 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: example as per Issue 287 (Monday, 29 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: example as per Issue 287 (Monday, 29 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Conformance profiles (Monday, 29 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Conformance profiles (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479) (Monday, 29 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014) (Saturday, 27 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014) (Friday, 26 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Guidance definitions (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof definitions (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: data specification & data profile definitions updated (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Guidance definitions (#1016) (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Guidance definitions (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof definitions (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: data specification & data profile definitions updated (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Change all occurences of "Dublin Core Terms" to "DCMI Metadata Terms" in Conneg-by-AP (#992) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Update index.html (#994) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Sunday, 14 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Sunday, 14 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Incorrect reference to PROF-IETF in conneg-by-ap (#954) (Sunday, 14 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 4 July)

pedro winstley

• DXWG Plenary: 2019-07-30T20:00:00 (Monday, 29 July)
• ACTION REQUIRED: Poll on submitting DCAT draft for CR (Tuesday, 23 July)
• DXWG Plenary 2019-07-23T20:00:00 (Sunday, 21 July)
• DXWG Plenary Meeting: 2019-07-16T20:00:00 (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• poll on 'profile' (Friday, 12 July)
• Poll reminder (Thursday, 11 July)
• Poll on proposal for definition of 'profile' for use with CONNEG and DCAT (Wednesday, 10 July)
• DXWG Plenary meeting: 2019-07-09T20:00:00 (Sunday, 7 July)
• Vocbench and DCAT V2 draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• DXWG Plenary - 2019-07-02T20:00:00 (Monday, 1 July)

pwin via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Pwin edit dcat 20190425 (#913) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)

rduerr via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Monday, 8 July)

Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 (#1010) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] PR Addressing issue #983 (#998) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: for external terms, skos:definition becomes skos:scopeNote, and 'In t… (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007) (Friday, 19 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing issue958 (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing issue958 (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] adding the Italian translation for the scope note mentioned in issue 980 (#1004) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pull addressing issue #987 (#996) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR accepting suggestion in issue #973 (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR accepting suggestion in issue #973 (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Fixing syntax issues for issue 980 (#1004) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing syntax issues for issue 980 (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (#997) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR to address issue #934 (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR to address issue #934 (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR Addressing issue #983 (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR Addressing issue #983 (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Pull addressing issue #987 (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Pull addressing issue #987 (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat description inconsistency (#935) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [dxwg] usage note and definition for odrl:hasPolicy need to be updated in TTL (#987) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing feedback in issue #935 (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing feedback in issue #935 (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing dcat.ttl translation in italian (Tuesday, 9 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Completing dcat.ttl translation in italian (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Indicate DCAT version in the `skos:changeNote`s (#984) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #966 (Tuesday, 9 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #966 (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Monday, 8 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Add Czech translation (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Friday, 5 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: adding cataloged resources explicitly ( for issue #967) (Thursday, 4 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: adding cataloged resources explicitly ( for issue #967) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Monday, 1 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Replace prov#Role with #Class:Relationship for hadRole (#962) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Replace prov#Role with #Class:Relationship for hadRole (#962) (Monday, 1 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Monday, 1 July)

Rob Atkinson via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Saturday, 27 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Conneg Definitions (#1014) (Thursday, 25 July)
• [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage (Monday, 15 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] Consider requirements for specifying the order in which content negotiation is performed (#500) (Monday, 15 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: removed contentious statements about nature of DCMI documents (Friday, 12 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: removed contentious statements about nature of DCMI documents (Friday, 12 July)
• [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 4 July)
• [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Ruben Verborgh via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)

Simon Cox via GitHub

• [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #1023 - Fix cardinality Catalog->Record (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing #1023 - Fix cardinality Catalog->Record (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing issue #725 - context for scope notes (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Editorial nits (#1013) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 (#1010) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Some minor editorial nits in DCAT (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Some minor editorial nits in DCAT (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Pwin edit dcat 20190425 (#913) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Sunday, 21 July)
• Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Friday, 19 July)
• [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936) (Friday, 19 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Further tweaks to distribution explanations. (Thursday, 18 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Further tweaks to distribution explanations. (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Profiles and distributions (#531) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Links to ISO-19115-1... (#1001) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Romanian translation of DCAT (#927) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Add Czech translation (#936) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Changes to scopeNote for dcat:Resource according to issue #980 (#1003) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl (#1006) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix two minor issues that were preventing OWLAPI loading dcat.ttl (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation (#988) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Why some skos:definition for dc terms are missing in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Thursday, 11 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation (Thursday, 11 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove w3cgeo lat/long/alt recommendation (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Current https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat.ttl is inconsistent (#944) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] dcat.ttl - editorialNotes (#920) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Inconsistent use of "profile" / "application profile" (#937) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Subtitle not included in SpecRef entries (#939) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (Monday, 1 July)
• [dxwg] Pull Request: Split namespace table into normative and non-normative (Monday, 1 July)
• [dxwg] Segregate namespaces into normative and non-normative sets (#968) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Monday, 1 July)

Siri Jodha S Khalsa via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Friday, 5 July)

Stephen Richard via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription (#960) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource usage note (#980) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] URL/URI inconsistency in dcat:endpointURL comment (#934) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] [I18N] References to ISO-639 vs. BCP47 (#959) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Basic Geo vocabulary considerations (#970) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] notes on 6.15.4 and 6.15.5 latituge and longitude (#974) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] 6.7.19 mention other data package formats (#973) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] Scope notes for URL properties (#972) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] dcat conformance question (#967) (Monday, 1 July)

Thomas Baker

• DXWG priorities (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Definition of "profile" - updated (Wednesday, 10 July)

Tom Kralidis via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] JSON examples (#971) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [dxwg] JSON examples (#971) (Tuesday, 2 July)

tombaker via GitHub

• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] refining the definition of profile in response to the poll (#989) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963) (Monday, 1 July)

xueyuan

• Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Extended until 31 December 2019 (Friday, 5 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2019 23:59:19 UTC