W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:35:28 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-459192155-1548902127-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I'm finally figuring out something that has been very confusing to me in the diagrams, so this example has helped in that way, thanks. In the diagram in "Figure 3" here it shows a box for ProfileY that has 2 resources, RS2 & RS3. Those link to a single Resource Descriptor "box" representing the class. I think this mixes instance data and the data model rather oddly.  For diagrams representing instance data  either one could 

1. not include the type declaration "boxes", since they make kind of a mess of the diagram
1. use a different kind of diagram that combines the type and the "thing" in a single box

Having the classes represented separately from the members of the classes when illustrating instance data is what I find confusing - it mixes "things" and "the classes those things are classes of" as if they exist separately, and they do not. 


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/642#issuecomment-459192155 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 02:35:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:29 UTC