W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF] (#79)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:10:33 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-457027831-1548292232-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The ED now has two consecutive chapters addressing this issue: 
- [Attribution roles](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#qualified-attribution) for dataset-agent relations
- [Relationships between datasets and other catalogued resources](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#qualified-relationship) for dataset-dataset relations

These use the common qualified form to provide extensibility in the nature of the relationship. 
Is this enough? or is there a need for some text drawing attention to the common pattern (which also appears in PROV, SSN and many other places). 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/79#issuecomment-457027831 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2019 01:10:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:06 UTC