- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:07:32 +0000
- To: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Karen, On Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:27 AM, Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] wrote: > It looks like there was still ongoing discussion about that one at #288: > > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/288 > > Can anyone say if the discussion in the conneg meeting came to a > resolution for the questions there? I'm not quite sure I understand your question... As I see it, #267 [1] is about content that is distributed as a container (the example we had in the last cneg meeting was an atom document that contains the ten most popular <whatever> and the descriptions of the <whatever>). Then we need a profile that describes the container (an atom document that is also a "ten most popular" list) and another profile that describes the <whatever> items in the container. If #267 relates to #288 [2] it would mean that #288 must offer a way to describe the container structure and the items in the container in a machine-interpretable way. Is that correct? And no, we didn't come to a resolution for this. If my understanding is correct I'd say it's more prof-ontology than prof-conneg... [1] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/267 [2] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/288 Best, Lars > On 1/16/19 12:53 PM, Rob Atkinson via GitHub wrote: > > in UCR at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RDIC > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 21 January 2019 17:07:57 UTC